Funding holds the key to autonomy for universities
Innovative financing patterns may not be plausible within the boundaries of existing government regulations
The University Grants Commission (UGC)
recently granted autonomy to 60 educational institutions including
Central universities, state universities and autonomous colleges. They
can now recruit foreign faculty, enrol foreign students and even give
incentive-based emoluments to the faculty. They are free to decide their
fee structure, syllabus and curriculum.
Once
the promised autonomy from the University Grants Commission comes
about, colleges will be free to decide their fee structure, syllabus and
curriculum
The Central and the state universities have been set up by Acts of Parliament or the state legislature and are, in fact, already classified as autonomous organisations in government parlance. But in practice, these universities need approval from the government on every aspect of their functioning and have to regularly report compliance. This time, however, the UGC promises real freedom.
The Central and the state universities have been set up by Acts of Parliament or the state legislature and are, in fact, already classified as autonomous organisations in government parlance. But in practice, these universities need approval from the government on every aspect of their functioning and have to regularly report compliance. This time, however, the UGC promises real freedom.
Are the measures enough? Three issues stand out. First is the
existing source of funding.
The Central and state universities have so
far sustained themselves through budgetary grants from the government,
academic fee receipts from the students and interest earned from
investment of government funds parked in banks. Since they are financed
by the government, they are tied to government regulations. They are
also subject to rigorous government audit. These regulations often
hinder quick decision-making and innovation. The second issue is that of
human resource. The finance officers have hardly dealt with the
techniques required in the modern era to raise funds.
The third problem pertains to bureaucracy. The executive and the
finance committees comprise in-house officials and representatives of
the government departments. The objective of these committees is to
ensure that the institution works in line with the framework of the
government. Can the existing system, therefore, implement the new
autonomy measures?
If the proposed autonomy is to flourish, it will require
innovative design and financing patterns which may not be plausible
within the boundaries of existing government regulations. First and
foremost, functional autonomy should be accompanied with financial
autonomy. Government directives should be restricted to the portion of
the aid provided by the government, while any money raised by the
institution on its own should be allowed to be spent by the institution
as it deems fit. Flexibility in recruitment should follow. The
government rules should be applicable only for posts financed by
government aid. Finally, the administrative structure should be made
more broad-based to include professionals in the finance and executive
committees. This will ensure an alternative thinking, away from the
traditional government line.
(
Sudeshna Sen is Professor, National
Institute of Financial Management and former secretary, NCERT The views
expressed are personal
)
No comments:
Post a Comment